Whatsapp as a teaching and learning tool by higher education teachers: an investigation using the TAM technology acceptance model

Leonardo Campinha dos Santos, Angilberto Sabino de Freitas, Jorge Brantes Ferreira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2020011

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to propose and test a theoretical model to investigate factors that influence the use of WhatsApp by higher education instructors as a tool to enhance the teaching and learning process during traditional (face-to-face) classes. For this, we used the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Following an online survey that resulted in a sample of 229 higher education instructors. The collected data was analyzed through the Structural Equations Modeling (SEM). The results show that compatibility has a strong influence on perceived ease of use, perceived utility and attitude towards use. Moreover, attitude towards use also has a relevant effect on the intention to use WhatsApp as an educational technology. Finally, the results suggest that higher education instructors, when evaluating mobile learning technologies, consider the compatibility with their values, needs and experiences, combined with the perception of how useful it can be in the classroom, as relevant factors in forming a positive attitude towards using the new technology, such as WhatsApp in this case, for teaching purposes.


Keywords

technology acceptance model (TAM); m-learning; WhatsApp; structural equation modeling

Compartilhe

References


Ahad, A. D., & Lim, S. M. A. (2014). Convenience or nuisance?: The ‘WhatsApp’ dilemma. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(6), 189-196.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018, outubro). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: a systematic review. Computers & Education, 125(SPE), 389-412.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459-489.

Banda, S. L. (2011). What Are The Main Determinants For The Attitude to Use Mobile Phone Application in Suriname. Dissertation, Maastricht School of Management (MSM), Maastricht, the Netherlands and the FHR Institute for Social Studies (FHR), Suriname.

Barbosa, J., Hahn, R., Barbosa, D., & Saccol, A. (2011). A ubiquitous learning model focused on learner interaction. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(1), 62-83.

Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 13, 217-231.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. 2. ed. New York: Routledge.

Caudill, J. G. (2007). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: parallel developments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Athabasca, 8(2), 1-13.

Che, X., & Ip, B. (2017). History and development. Social Networks in China, Kidlington: Chandos Publishing, 1–44. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101934-4.00001-7.

Cheung, R., & Vogel, D.R. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175.

Crescente, M. L., & Lee, D. (2011). Critical issues of m-learning: design models, adoption processes, and future trends. Journal of The Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 28(2), 111-123.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.

Davis, F. D., & Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer Technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1002.

Ferreira, J., Klein, A., Freitas, A., & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning: definition, uses and challenges. In: L. A. Wankel, P. Blessinger (Eds.). Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Applications: Smartphones, Skype and Texting Technologies. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education (Vol. 6, pp. 47-82). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Ferreira, J. B., Freitas, A. S., Carvalho, M. L. A., Azevedo, H. C., Gobbo, A. M. C., & Giovannini, C. J. (2014). Intention to use m-learning in higher education settings. Pretexto, 15, Edição Especial Pró-Administração, 11-28.

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude. Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Freitas, A. S. (2009). A Implementação do E-Learning nas Escolas de Gestão: Um Modelo Integrado para o Processo de Alinhamento Ambiental. Tese de Doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, RJ, Brasil.

Freitas, A. S., & Bandeira-De-Mello, R. (2012). Managerial action and sensemaking in e-learning implementation in Brazilian business schools. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1.286-1.299.

Garcia-Cabot, A., De-Marcos, L., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2015). An empirical study on m-learning adaptation: learning performance and learning contexts. Computers & Education, 82, 450-459.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7a. ed.). Nova Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Huang, J., Lin, Y., & Chuang, S. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: a perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 585-598.

Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124-137.

Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211-1219.

Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: a literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210-226.

Lu, X. & Viehland, D. (2008, December). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Learning Procceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Christchurch. New Zealand.

Machado, P. A., Bellini, C. G. P., & Leite, J. C. L. (2012). Adoção de inovação tecnológica em educação a distância. Revista Gestão & Planejamento, 13(2), 295-300.

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.

Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Krishnan, R. (2006). Marketing Research (2a ed.). South-Western College Pub.

Park, S. U., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2011). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.

Parsons, D., Ryu, H., & Cranshaw, M. (2007). A design requirements framework for mobile learning environments. Journal of Computers, 2(4), 1-8.

Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Oluwasola, D. O., Dipeolu, O., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2018). Facilitating professional mobile learning communities with instant messaging. Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.005

Rajasingham, L. (2009). Breaking boundaries: Quality elearning for global knowledge society. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(1), 58-65.

Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544-561.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5a ed.). Nova Iorque: Free Press.

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019, janeiro). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(SPE), 13-35.

Sperber, A. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instrument for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126(1), 124-128.

Straub, D. W. (1994). The effect of culture on IT diffusion: e-mail and fax in Japan and the US. Information Systems Research, 5(1), 23-47.

Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Hall, M., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Walton, S. M.. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Yeboah, J., & Ewur, G.D. (2014). The impact of WhatsApp messenger usage on students performance in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 157-164.

Yin, C. L. (2016). Adoption of WhatsApp instant messaging among students in ipoh higher education institutions. Dissertation, Wawasan Open University Penang, Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia .

Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2(3), 251-280.

Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.